Robert: My
first piece of choreography as an adult was site-specific. I was studying music
at York University and in an attempt at taking dance classes again, I found
myself in site-specific choreography. The class culminated in a showing that
toured the concrete jungle campus, stopping in places that the students had
chosen for choreography. In studying this type of work before entering the
realm of formal dance & technical training, I immediately began to see human
movement as part of a larger context and environment. In site-specific work,
the choreographer seeks out places where they think that they can make moments
happen. For the CSA Nooner, the location is predetermined and so it's more of a
case of bringing dance to an environment where it may be surprising.
Some people feel
that to present dance in a public space tells people that they can look at art
the same way that they look at a water bottle or shoelace. I think that the
journey towards embodiment is accessible in every place, every moment and
through any kind of interaction so this kind of work excites me. I feel as a
choreographer a lot of my time & skill goes into sensing my environment.
Through site-specific work I feel that my sense of being can be useful in
having an affect on the space. For the Nooner I picked the flight of 6 steps
facing away from the audience's seats. To make choices that go against audience
expectations is one of the first rules.
The piece that I
remounted was originally presented in a parquette just north of Queen &
Yonge, in Toronto. This was a place that reeked of urine and was not
maintained. I took photos of all of the litter, printed them and put them
throughout the space during our performance. As a trio, we did a half hour
meditation that moved along the surfaces of the space in an attempt at bringing
some gravity and thoughtfulness to the environment. People who frequented the
space interacted by joining us in climbing the structures of the parquette as
though it were a playground. A man peed in the direction of the performance,
but did it in a way that said 'this is what I do here'. We did not take
offence, in fact a viewer cried at their perception of what seemed ironic and
beautiful.
Needless to say
the performance at the University Centre was less interactive. The students
that I observed seem shy and in a rush. A little bit of this energy made its
way into my performance too. I had set a strong intention to interact with the
other dancers and be open to the audience, but felt a little less present than
I like to be. Being raised above the audience disconnected me from them. In a
theatre, they are usually raised above you. That day I was reminded of the
frantic sense of disembodiment I experienced during University. This was for
me, the major reason I started dancing again. Full circle.
Thank you Robert for your reflections. Its great to get the choreographer/dancer point of view of performing in site specific locations. Great work!!
ReplyDeleteCatrina